Discover & Read Best Stories about espn football news. Also Read about .
Okay, this is a very important question
First, you need to understand what is exactly fake news?
Every journalists have their personal bias
Every historian have their personal bias
Every editorial column have their personal bias
What is fake news then compared to that?
Unless, you, yourself saw a particular event taking place in front of your eyes, you cannot trust anything blindly with your eyes
Let me give you a perfect example here-
You have heard Donald Trump was shouting fake news, fake news
You have to research on those to know what exactly the fake news. When you are doing the research you have to make sure the tools you are using, you know everything about their company sources and political affiliation
Let me tell you something that you probably won't hear from most
Most occasions those who are championing the cause of fighting against fake news, have their own political agenda, it is because their political biased news isn't getting traction as much as they previously anticipated hence panic and rush to eliminate that naming it fake news
It works in both ways those who are against Trump and for Trump
So be very careful keeping all this in mind and remember every news organisations are biased
How do one counter that then?
Use Google search - reverse search tool (Remember neither Google nor Wikipedia is without any bias, so be very careful keeping all this in mind)
The only person that you can trust is yourself and your instinct, make sure you are following your instinct, if anything you find suspicious check and double check, remember so called fake news travel faster than original news as most often it is boring
Check the particular account that is spreading such news which you are suspecting to be little dicey. Check it's past activity, what is his political affiliation. Remember politics is everywhere, specially where someone is trying to be innocent :D
Don't absolutely believe anyone you met on social media, it's true not just these circumstances but everywhere else also. Remember stalking starts from here. A little sceptical goes long way here
When you are hearing a political news, don't believe completely from either sources of opposite spectrum, truth could be somewhere in between. However this is not a gospel truth either. So be careful about that as well
Keep an open mind, don't believe any conspiracy theory or propaganda, remember most effective propaganda doesn't sound like propaganda so be very careful about that
good news and bad news
Good news and bad news
Parthiv Patel back in India Test team
More than eight years after his previous Test match, and four years after his last international, wicket keeper Parthiv Patel has earned a recall to India's Test team.
Updated India squad
Virat Kohli (capt), Ajinkya Rahane, KL Rahul, M Vijay, Cheteshwar Pujara, Karun Nair, Parthiv Patel (wk), R Ashwin, Ravindra Jadeja, Jayant Yadav, Amit Mishra, Mohammed Shami, Umesh Yadav, Ishant Sharma, Bhuvneshwar Kumar, Hardik Pandya
At 17 years and 153 days, Parthiv Patel Became Test cricket's youngest wicket keeper in 2002; now he will be the second-oldest member in the XI if no other change is made to the side that took field in Visakhapatnam.
Parthiv came in because of an injury to first-choice keeper Wriddhiman Saha, who strained his left thigh during the second Test against England in Visakhapatnam. He will not play the third Test to avoid aggravating the injury.
The announcement came about 15 hours after the India squad had been announced with only one change. Gautam Gambhir had been dropped with Bhuvneshwar Kumar's return bolstering the pace department.
In a release, the BCCI said: "As a precautionary measure, Saha has been advised rest and will not play in the next Test match of the series. Parthiv Patel will replace Saha in the Indian team for the third Test." The match is set to be played from November 26 in Mohali.
Parthiv, 31, was ahead of other candidates to fill Saha's role because he offers the option of a left-hand batsman. Also, it is understood that the selectors felt it was too early to hand a debut to the 19-year-old Rishabh Pant, who has hit a triple-hundred for Delhi this Ranji Trophy season and smashed a 48-ball ton in a game in which he scored twin centuries.
The other big contender was Madhya Pradesh's Naman Ojha, who played the last Test that Saha missed. Ojha missed the start of the Ranji Trophy with injury. However, he did play MP's last match.
Tamil Nadu's Dinesh Karthik, who has also had a good recent run with the bat, is believed to have lost to Parthiv because of the latter's better glove work and the left-hand batting variation.
Parthiv, who last played Test cricket in August 2008, also had a fine start to the 2016-17 Ranji Trophy with the bat for Gujarat. He scored 415 runs in his first eight innings at 59.28, with three fifties and a hundred. The century came in the previous round of games, in Gujarat's second innings against MP. It was a brisk, unbeaten knock: 139 not out off 170 balls.
"Parthiv was considered going by form and also the wicketkeeping aspect. More importantly, being a left-hand bat - England have a legspinner and a left-arm spinner in Adil Rashid and Zafar Ansari. So, a left-hander will add more to the team," a BCCI official told.
"Naman had some injuries; he didn't play in the first three-four matches of the Ranji Trophy this year. As far as keeping is concerned as well, Parthiv stands ahead of Dinesh Karthik. Overall, as a package, he fits the team's requirements. There is no doubt that Parthiv's glove work has improved considerably in the last few years. Not sure which position he will bat in; it is up to the team now."
Parthiv debuted in England in 2002, and has played 20 Tests till date for 41 catches, eight stumpings and 683 runs at 29.69 with a best of 69.
Source: ESPN CrickInfo
What do you think about the documentary named Two Nations One Obsession on India Australia rivalry in Cricket?
Peter Dickson is good flim maker so no wonder it was done well.
Anyone reading this can watch these two part documentary movie on Sony and Ten Sports in India and in fox sports in Australia.
It is a very good movie.
You will enjoy it very much
Now coming back to Australia India rivalry.
I saw in internet some Pakistanis were trying their level best to prove that Australia and India have no such rivalry
Only England and South Africa have with Australia
Well, we all know the reason behind their desperation, they are trying to prove somehow that the fact that Indian team don't really need Pakistan team for Cricket is hurting them more than anything
We all know Pakistan won't stop terrorism against us that easily but this is the only thing that they really care about and get hurt. Young delusional Pakistanis are getting killed by doing terrorist activities against India is no such problems to them. Ha, ha, such an enlighted country Pakistan. A lot of things one needs to learn from Pakistan :D
Truth is yeah, ordinary Australian don't care about any other rivalry other than ashes not because of it is Cricket but because of long history and Australian people feel that they need to prove something always to British
But South Africa is more important to Australia than India in Cricket!!!!
That's just pure jealousy :D
Truth is there is a reason why Caucasian people don't necessarily enjoy Cricket as much as they used to
Contrary to the popular opinion, most of the white Caucasian people are not really that excited about high paced life always
Yeah, I know because I have lived those countries for certain time.
There are plenty of people in Caucasian population are conservative, I mean sexually conservative, they are not really what you get to see in movies
Otherwise Church would have been vanished by now from Caucasian world :D
There's a reason why Base ball still exists in America :D
Now Cricket's case what has been going on- is simply the after effects of post multiculturalism movement through out Caucasian population
There are too many multicultured people in everywhere today in Caucasian world according to many Caucasian.
In soccer that is not the case in England
It is still a white people's sport
Let's face it Soccer is more of a Euro Latin American sports than World sports(Asian teams create more hype than anything else, African countries always look good on papers but they are like West Indies team in Cricket never really that good, actually West Indies team is better in Cricket)
Yeah, everyone knows that every country play soccer but the truth is they are not really up to the level of certain 9 European countries and certian 5 Latin American countries
If one check the stats of all World Cup winning team from over the years, it will be very clear
Other than some blind soccer fans everyone admit this :D
In England's case if you walk down various streets of London, you will see White people are getting increasingly covered slowly but surely
This is why White British people instinctively looking for things that they can be relied on as par as their identity's concern
It's not because they don't have any time or they are super busy (yeah, believe me white people are not as busy as we think :D) or Cricket is taking too much time, they simply instinctively feel more comfortable playing a sport like Soccer where there is white dominance, they are naturally drawn to it
To be very honest it's not really that surprising if we were in their place, we would have done the same thing
Same is with Australia's recent love with Australian rules football
Same is with SA and New Zealand's love with Rugby
Asian people (more specifically South Asian Indian subcontinent people) are quite dominating in certain white countries, they are getting sick of that inside as a result their tendency to such activities become very normal human behaviour
Football coaches in England has admitted this in number of times
Future of Cricket is very bright indeed but only from Indian subcontinent people's point of view as white people will become increasingly shrunken with times and it's already happening
So what they think or prefer may not matter that much in the future
At least 40% of people could become Indian subcontinent in the future, it's a very real possibility so one can guess the scenario
Plus Cricket won't look like then what it is today, it will completely change, if anyone time travel to future now, he will understand why that is the case :D
So the point of this long boring writing is we don't need white people
We certainly don't need Pakistan :D
Pakistan may need us or not but it doesn't matter to us either way, we are pretty well placed right now politically and financially for the future
What we see today is only going to increase more in the future from India's point of view
That old fashioned thinking of certain urban Indians that what White people do only cool is a thing of past
This is age of internet everything has changed
Even what urban Indians promote will be thought upon as cool by rest of the India isn't the case anymore
Look at our most young generation and imagine the next one, we won't be insecured of anybody or anything in the future (including sex) and it's already happening :D