Best shayri Stories, Status, Quotes, Shayari, Poem, Videos on Nojoto. Also Read about shayri Quotes, shayri Shayari, shayri Videos, shayri Poem and shayri WhatsApp Status in English, Hindi, Urdu, Marathi, Gujarati, Punjabi, Bangla, Odia and other languages on Nojoto.
#जुर्म #जमाना #दस्तूर#nojotohindi
I think that's going too far with emotions as we are probably (it's better to be optimistic than looser mentality) losing this match(5th ODIs between Australia and India) :D
We are still very very very good team and have a great chance to win World Cup
First of all, they(Indian team management) screwed up little bit with timing of their players and choosing and picking them to play in the no 4 position
For example we still have no idea who will be our no 4 and that's not a good thing.
Now let me explain how they screwed up-
Ajinkya Rahane: He played far too many games for India in limited over's cricket when everyone knew that he isn't limited over's cricketer. He played closed to hundred ODIs without any match winning abilities. He was partially responsible for Indian team loosing the match in 2015 WC against Australia and in 2016 WC against West Indies, he just couldn't score quickly enough
Manish Pandey: He was scoring runs and performing but then Ajinkya Rahane was playing in his position and he was either in reserved bench or out of the squad when he got his chances later, he wasn't as good as he was before, remember his match winning century innings against Australia but that never happened again, this is why players need to get enough chances when they are in form, specially when he is a young cricketer
Shreyas Iyer: What happened with him, huh? He got so little chances, what the case here only Rahane is supposed to play close to hundred ODIs without any match winning abilities or performances, Shreyas Iyer, I thought talented player from Mumbai was wasted because he wasn't favourite child of Gavaskar and Sanjay Manjrekar (:D), really sad, I believe he was a limited over's cricketer not Rahane
KLRahul: He got debut in what 5 years ago for India. He debuted with a magnificent century in ODIs with a match winning knock with a high strikes rates. And he played 15 ODIs in 5 years!!!!!!?? He was mostly out of the team despite early performance and was sitting outside. He was performing magnificently in T20Is yet he wasn't getting any place in the T20Is squad when he had better average and strike rates than everyone in world cricket!!??!!!! In the last match he got chance to bat after so many months, and he was playing well, didn't throw the wicket like Vijay Shankar today, yet he was dropped today. And we are wondering why he has mental issues when it comes to his batting. Why suddenly he lost confidence in his batting? Are you fucking kidding me?? Player like Rahane plays close 100 ODIs without any match winning performance and KLRahul is getting harsh treatment despite impressive performance!!! And we are wondering why??!!! No wonder we don't know who is our number four yet. If we don't handle our talented players then we will be in this position. Rohit Sharma wasn't performing either in early part of his career but Dhoni stuck with him and now look at the result. KLRahul is talented like Rohit Sharma, he can absolutely decimated opposition but he never got any long rope at all. Saurabh Ganguly gave plenty of chances to Shewag and look how that turned out
Rishabh Pant: First of all, Rishabh Pant does not have a very good record in domestic 50 over's matches in India. He has 20 something average. He has only performed in IPL and Ranji trophy. But still knowing his ability, they should have given a long rope before WC just as a batsman but that didn't happen either. Ishan Kishan has 40+ average and 98+ strike rates in domestic 50 over's matches in India and he didn't get a single game to play in ODIs (:D) but hey at least Rahane played 100 ODIs without any match winning abilities. Maybe we should give Indian team the name “Gavaskar and Sanjay Manjrekar's favourite team”
Shubhmaan Gill: He was performing regularly for the last one year in list A matches and in Indian domestic 50 over's matches and he just got two opportunities despite the fact everyone knows his ability to win match with strokes all over the ground (:D), Oh! I forgot he isn't Rahane, other lesser batsman would only get one or two match :D
Vijay Shankar: We just know too little about him to comment anything, he isn't an all-rounder, more of part time medium pacer who can bat but not really match winner either with bat but we still don't know much about him to comment, he slightly overrated by the Indian team management
Mayank Markandey: We all know that wrist spinners are performing very well nowadays even those who aren't that talented. Weirdly batsmans all over today are struggling to play wrist spinners. And we had another young wrist spinner after Kuldeep and Chahal who tossed the ball and he just got one game and that too in a T20Is match against New Zealand and after that nothing :D
I think you probably understood by now what is our problem?
Poor handling of real talent and overrating player like Rahane in limited over's cricket when he always was a test cricketer strictly therefore giving him plenty of chances at the cost of other more suitable ODIs batsman when they were in form.
Oh! Ha, international Olympic association is based on lobby, it is the same answer as the following answer of this question-
Should ICC ban Pakistan from participating in 2019 Cricket WC in England?
Nope, it's not going to happen
ICC won't ban them. Probably but I am not too sure, it's Pakistan after India generate most money although there's a huge gap in that as well as Pakistan doesn't play in their own country and in UAE, there's hardly any people on the ground
So, do they generate enough money at all?
Or is it countries like England and Australia after India generate money?
I don't know, do you?
So if Pakistan doesn't generate enough money then it's slightly easier to ban them but will it happen?
First of all, this is all international lobby thing
Let me explain, when they banned South Africa because of racism, it's because of large caucasian lobby in the world and even in ICC it was two caucasian countries like England and Australia were in charge of cricket back then
Let's look at the huge caucasian lobby in the world, Europe, North America and South America (South America is basically a poor version of Europe with majority of non caucasian native people in certain cases as exception)
So racism was a huge issue to these caucasian lobby then and now.
As it directly involving their social lives.
Now in Pakistan's case, terrorism is even bigger and deadliest issue than racism.
But then again, it just between India and Pakistan, it doesn't have anything to do with caucasian lobby hence it's importance is almost nothing to them which is why it would never get any such importance
Now imagine if Israel and Palestine were playing cricket or Iraq, Syria and America and these Islamic countries only good at cricket or only give a damn about cricket therefore banning them from cricket will make everyone in these countries take notice(in Pakistan terrorism has become a normal thing and they learnt to live with that as a result they don't understand what the big deal is this, this is why cricket is the only thing that can give them best burn as they are totally emotionally involved with cricket), yep then it will be a serious serious issue and they will be banned to feel the burn :D
Get the point :D
So should ICC ban Pakistan?
Ideally they should
But will it happen?
Absolutely not and that's even if we don't play in the World Cup
This will only work when our status as country will grow into as The Top Nation in the world as otherwise we don't have any huge lobby like Caucasian lobby so anything less won't work
See, we need to first understand that we don't have a strong lobby like Israel have in Western countries
Jews themselves are white people and are existing before the birth of Jesus Christ. Before the Hitler episode they were living in various European countries. Many powerful European country’s rise are because of Jews. Think England, think Scotland, no wonder British don't want to break Soctland from Britain. Many financial institutions exist in Scotland which are made by Jews.
After World War because of all the sufferings of Jews, their position has become stronger than ever in European countries
Let's talk about America.
Think about every major corporations and institution in America, there's a Jew behind it.
Hollywood is owned by Jews
So no wonder they have such a strong lobby
We are not Israel, we don't have any such advantage. Our lobbying happen through Jew lobby in Europe and America.
So you can understand that we have a very limited lobby so in situations such as this no matter how significant it is to us, unless it directly impacting caucasian lobby, they don't give a shit about us
So it is not really that surprising that they don't give a shit about Pulwama attack
Those who are surprised by this, I have to say this is not a new thing, we had to face this forever.
Pakistan does terrorism and we had to compromise because of Outside pressure.
This has been going on forever.
Only way to counter this is to become Strongest and richest country in the world as we don't have any strong lobby and we are dependend on other country's whim.